Skip to content
Z

zachclarke

Visitor

Member since Jan 13, 2018

Parks
13
Downloads
13
Ratings
4
Avg. Rating
4.4
Forum Posts
0

RVA

Argentavis

Layout is decent but not super interesting, however transitions are all smooth. Some nice basic landscaping and foliage work. Unique color scheme.

I like the creative and unique name

Montu Recreation

First off, the scenery is outstanding. Everything is incredibly detailed and accurate, very impressive.

Second, the ride itself has some serious issues. In many places there are extreme pumps, deformations in the shaping, and wild inconsistencies in the force comb. The track isn't even heartlined. I'm not really sure where to begin with this, so I'm just going to leave it as "needs very heavy reworking" to be acceptable. The difference in quality between the scenery and coaster layout is completely stunning, to say the least.

The ride didn't feel like it had much coherence; the elements don't really flow together well. Each overbank and airtime hill felt separated from the previous element, and this may be due to the extremely abrupt and sharp banking transitions. The forest and lake were nice details, and they complimented the ride's color scheme well. The custom supports mostly look good, if not a little beefy and over-flanged. Overall it's a decent ride that would heavily benefit from some transition refinement.

Invert: Some pretty jolty transitions on this one but it's probably survivable so eh. Ride is fast paced and has a couple interesting elements like the first drop and downward inline.

Hyper: Good airtime but feels a little sluggish compared to the other two. Still some whack transitions.

Woodie: Best of the three. Trackwork is mostly smooth, pacing is great and has a lot of airtime. Really like the twisted double down first drop.

Overall: Good use of terrain, but wish there was more timed interaction between the three rides, especially the 3-way crossover through the invert loop.

1 to 4 of 4